Parametric FAQ

Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled at any time directly from your account settings. There is no minimum contract period on PRO plans. If you cancel, your projects remain accessible until the end of your current billing period, and you can export them as .obj, .3dm, or .csv to preserve your work.

Yes. The enterprise plan is built for organizations running multiple projects across teams. It includes dedicated onboarding, training for your staff, ongoing support, and the ability to integrate custom building systems or organization-specific rulesets into Hektar. Pricing is based on team size and use case. Contact us through the meeting page to discuss your setup.

Hektar PRO is offered in tiers (PRO 1, 2, and 3) based on usage. Each tier includes the same core features and data access. The difference is the number of generations included per month. You pay for the volume of feasibility work you actually do, not for unlocking features. Most individual users land on PRO 1 or 2. Larger teams typically benefit from the enterprise plan.

Hektar's scenarios are designed for early-stage decision support, not for construction documentation. The geometry is accurate enough to inform acquisition, typology selection, and density negotiations. KPIs like BTA, coverage, and daylight hours are calculated from the actual generated geometry, not estimated. The trade-off is that Hektar does not replace detailed structural, MEP, or compliance verification. A scenario that performs well in Hektar still requires later validation. The accuracy is calibrated for the decisions made at this phase: yes or no to acquisition, which typology to develop further, how to negotiate density with the municipality.

Yes, raw land acquisition is one of the highest-value use cases. Before a bid, Hektar tests buildable density against the actual site constraints rather than rules-of-thumb. A site that looks weak under traditional density modeling can look strong when typology and constraint geometry are tested together. A site that looks strong on a coverage ratio basis can look weak when daylight, noise, and slope are layered in. Acquisition decisions made on tested density carry less hidden risk than those made on paper density.

Yes, though Hektar's strongest fit is multi-family and mixed-use development. Single-family housing works for projects with multiple units on a shared site, such as row houses, point houses, or small clusters. For a single villa on a single lot, Hektar is overkill. The tool's value scales with the number of decisions to make about typology, layout, and density. The more parcels and typology options on the table, the more useful Hektar becomes.